Approach Mark Barlowe
How I would enter a growth mandate.
Before changing the playbook, I would find where revenue is being created, where it is losing momentum, and what the customer already knows that the company may not.
Start with the system that exists
Diagnose before prescribing.
Every company already has a revenue system—whether it was deliberately designed or assembled over time. I would not arrive with a prewritten answer. I would begin by understanding what the current system produces, where it breaks, and what is worth protecting.
Market truthWho creates value—and why do they buy?
I would learn which customers produce durable value, what creates urgency, how the offer compares with the alternatives, and where the company already earns unusual trust. The goal is a shared commercial picture, not a collection of assumptions.
Revenue pathWhere does momentum disappear?
I would follow real opportunities from account selection through discovery, proposal, close, delivery, renewal, and expansion. The gaps between teams often explain more than the performance of any single stage.
Customer signalWhat are customers repeatedly trying to tell us?
Recent wins, losses, active conversations, and long-running relationships reveal patterns that dashboards miss. I would listen for the language customers use, the obstacles they share, and the outcomes they are actually willing to fund.
ConstraintWhat is the most valuable problem to solve first?
A growth system can be limited by market coverage, messaging, process friction, skills, the offer itself, or weak follow-through. I would resist changing everything at once and isolate the constraint with the greatest commercial leverage.
Operating proofHow will we know the change is working?
The measures should match the stage of the work. Early signals can establish adoption and quality; later measures should show meetings, opportunities, pipeline, retention, and revenue. Clear definitions keep optimism from outrunning evidence.